The wikipedia article I chose to analyze is the cocoa bean. For the most part, everything appears to be on topic. If there is one thing that stands out from the rest of the article, it would be the section on child slavery. Although not irrelevant, it appears to be less focused on the main topic of the article itself, and shifts tones slightly. This section also appears to be the only section with a somewhat biased tone. Although it initially appears neutral, there is a clear emphasis on articles that point out the controversy with the issue, meanwhile still not trying to sound blatantly persuasive. On the same topic of child slavery, this section appears to have only the perspective of those that may view the issue negatively (although this is somewhat unsurprising).

Overall, the references appear to be functional. All the information seems to be well up to date. The most recent edit was this past August. The discussions occurring on the talk page appear to be a mixture of wondering how the article could be improved and asking for general knowledge on the topic of cocoa. The article has been listed as B-class, though it had previously been rated as good. It is also part of three wiki projects: Food and drink, Africa, and plants.