The article I have chosen is about the divisions of Inca education and Inca education is general. The article is fairly short with two sub headings. My strongest critique is the article has no cited sources, which is extremely odd due to it being apart of two WikiProjects: Indigenous People of the Americas and Peru.
On the Talk Page, people from all the way back to 2006 have commented on the lack of sources, but no one has added anything. This tells me this page is not visited frequently and is an important reason why there are WikiProjects for the Indigenous People of the Americas and Peru. There are about only three comments on the talk page, and they only involve the lack of sources.
It seems that the article is neutral, but once again, it is difficult to gauge that without the sources. With that being said, the ideas within the article are neither under or over represented. However, there are a few phrases/words that could be linked to other articles, but they are just bolded, so it is difficult to find out more about Inca education.
With the lack of sources, the article should essentially not be trusted. However, it is a decent article with decent information.
This would be a great article to improve. Even if you just start with our library’s copy of The Incas: New Perspectives and worked from there, you’d be dramatically increasing the coverage of this topic.