“Indigenous women in politics: a complex proposition”

In the indigenous community of Santa María Quiegolani in Oaxaca, Mexico, there are changes in the law to promote women in those communities to participate in politics. However, these changes actually spark opposition from these same women the changes aim to help. This gained national attention with Eufrosina Cruz Mendoza who broke out of traditional ways of her indigenous community by studying at high school and a university. She ran in her indigenous community for municipal president but did not succeed as municipal authorities believe she cheated her way through by not going through traditional routes of election. While she lost within her own community, she rose to attain several positions at the state and national level. In these positions, she sponsored a reform to the Mexican Constitution which “recognizes the autonomy of the indigenous communities and their right to self-government.” Eufrosina wants to reform this so that “under no circumstance would this right undermine the right of women to participate in politics.” However, this reform is challenging traditional customs of the indigenous people of Oaxaca.

Eufrosina Cruz. Photo courtesy of  https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/288408

In Oaxaca, indigenous communities have autonomy to choose their own leaders. Many of the municipalities use usos y costumbres to select their authorities. In this system, people must do tequios, public service activities, in order to earn their right to participate in the government. There is no secret ballot and the system usually calls that people climb the ladder of positions. While women are able to vote and do hold municipal positions, only about 2% of municipalities had women as their municipal presidents. What stands in the way are several issues- the domestic chores of women and fear of government intervention. Zaira Hipólito López, a community psychologist says that it is a “double burden” for women; working for the community and taking care of domestic chores. Being part of the municipal does not pay like it does outside at the state and national level. Further, she says, when women’s husbands are elected, these women feel like they are participating “since they assume many of the men’s regular responsibilities.” Women have other fears, such as federal government intervention. This happens when municipal states do not follow federal guidelines or when there are internal conflicts. Some view this federal intervention as the government trying to take advantage of the communities’ resources. In addition, women feel the reform “violates their customs and their right of self-determination” and is “an imposition on their traditions”.

Women cast votes in Oaxaca, Mexico. Photo courtesy ofhttps://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/Latin-America-Monitor/2017/0106/Indigenous-women-in-politics-a-complex-proposition

This article uncovers some myths of the indigenous communities of Latin America, specifically in Mexico. For example, the news article recognizes that many people do not think that women are able to participate at all in the government. However, this is untrue. In most municipalities, women are able to vote and only 18% ban women from voting which the news article recognizes “is still too high, but the myth that all indigenous communities repress women’s right to vote is just that, a myth; 343 municipalities did allow them to have an electoral voice.” The author of this news story interviewed people from the indigenous community and took into perspective how the indigenous communities view “Western” ways. These views are not always transferable. They fear corruption and believe that well intentioned Western ideas can infringe on their rights as indigenous communities. [1]

In the context of class themes, this deals with indigenous people and their traditions. Many people continue to live in traditional ways and want to continue to do so- without outside influence. In general, people outside of these communities are often quick to make assumptions about their “backwardness” for keeping their traditional ways and not taking on Western ways. It does draw a fine line between wanting to help Indigenous people versus disrupting their traditions and culture. Questions arise about gender and gender roles. Do these women see themselves as oppressed or do they view this as a natural way of life? Should assumptions be made that gender roles everywhere be eradicated? Pertaining to this news article, it puts into perspective relations with the indigenous communities and brings to attention the issue of helping the indigenous people versus obstructing their traditions and cultures.

[1] Hoffay, Mercedes, “Indigenous women in politics: a complex proposition,” The Christian Science Monitor, January 6, 2017, https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/Latin-America-Monitor/2017/0106/Indigenous-women-in-politics-a-complex-proposition.

Links to other articles that relate to this news article:

Article on Eufrosina Cruz from a different perspective: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/288408

Article on 2001 Mexico Constitution reform:  http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-05782012000100002

Inca Education Critique

The article I have chosen is about the divisions of Inca education and Inca education is general. The article is fairly short with two sub headings. My strongest critique is the article has no cited sources, which is extremely odd due to it being apart of two WikiProjects: Indigenous People of the Americas and Peru.

On the Talk Page, people from all the way back to 2006 have commented on the lack of sources, but no one has added anything. This tells me this page is not visited frequently and is an important reason why there are WikiProjects for the Indigenous People of the Americas and Peru. There are about only three comments on the talk page, and they only involve the lack of sources.

It seems that the article is neutral, but once again, it is difficult to gauge that without the sources. With that being said, the ideas within the article are neither under or over represented. However, there are a few phrases/words that could be linked to other articles, but they are just bolded, so it is difficult to find out more about Inca education.

With the lack of sources, the article should essentially not be trusted. However, it is a decent article with decent information.

Wikipedia Article Critique – Mexica

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexica

“Mexica”

I looked at the Mexica people of modern day Mexico, most commonly referred to as the Aztec Empire. The content on this page fits the article adequately, but there seems to be a lack of more prominent information. There are some distractions on the words that have links to them. Words such as Mexico, are linked more than once. The article is missing a lot of information and only has two photos, so it doesn’t have much to distract the reader. Because the article is about a people, I don’t believe there can be a noticeable bias in articles like these.

No viewpoints are overrepresented or underrepresented, there just isn’t enough content to determine that yet. The citations are not at all reliable. There is only one link that actually leads to another site, but when you get to that site it’s just a search engine. The other two sources are inadequately cited. Overall, these sources are not reliable at all.

Most of this information has been added on a course of three years but has yet to be significantly edited. This article has potential to be a growing article, but as of now it remains stub-like.The article is not rated or classified yet, it needs much more information and citations before it becomes a complete article. More or less this article covers the more basic generic information that we discussed in class. It talks about their origin and their location in that colonial era.

Cocoa Bean

The wikipedia article I chose to analyze is the cocoa bean. For the most part, everything appears to be on topic. If there is one thing that stands out from the rest of the article, it would be the section on child slavery. Although not irrelevant, it appears to be less focused on the main topic of the article itself, and shifts tones slightly. This section also appears to be the only section with a somewhat biased tone. Although it initially appears neutral, there is a clear emphasis on articles that point out the controversy with the issue, meanwhile still not trying to sound blatantly persuasive. On the same topic of child slavery, this section appears to have only the perspective of those that may view the issue negatively (although this is somewhat unsurprising).

Overall, the references appear to be functional. All the information seems to be well up to date. The most recent edit was this past August. The discussions occurring on the talk page appear to be a mixture of wondering how the article could be improved and asking for general knowledge on the topic of cocoa. The article has been listed as B-class, though it had previously been rated as good. It is also part of three wiki projects: Food and drink, Africa, and plants.

Wikipedia Article Critique

The Wikipedia article I chose to evaluate was on the percussion instrument, the güiro. The article is rather short, but appears to be factual and follow the Wikipedia guidelines. It’s short so everything is relevant to the article topic. There was nothing distracting or out of place throughout the article. In addition, the tone seems neutral and unbiased. All of the links worked throughout the article. There was only one link under references that did not work. There is a subcategory on the page where all the information is from that source so that is a red flag. The other reference links were connected to books. The references seem appropriate and reliable. From what access I had to the books online, the books appear to be neutral, educational sources from a factual view.

There is a bit on the Talk page. There is talk about spelling, picture usage concern, removing a section, merging two pages, and songs with the güiro in it. I think these are really concerning to the topic. I believe some of the information could even be transferred to the main page with some minor editing. It is nice that people note the changes made or questions concerning the topic. The Talk page also includes the WikiProjects. The article is “of interest to the following WikiProjects”: WikiProject Cuba, WikiProject Latin music, WikiProject Puerto Rico, WikiProject Musical Instruments, and WikiProject Percussion. These all pertain to the topic.

One concern with this Wikipedia article is how short the article is in length. Finding extensive information for this topic can be hard. Representationally, a few questions arise. Who uses this instrument today and who used it in the past? Is this a general Latin American instrument or is it more centralized to a specific area? Perhaps the instrument may be used differently in varying parts of Latin America. The history of the uses of the güiro and the use of it today is something that could be added. Perhaps it was used in a religious ritual or governmental ceremony. The sound bite is another concern. There is no citation for it. Musically speaking, it is very bare and two different sounds are heard, one at the beginning and one at the end. Perhaps this can be explained as it may cause confusion. Hearing an instrument is extremely important to further the understanding of an instrument. I think having several sound bites would be fascinating and useful. A sound bite with minimal instrumentation would be beneficial and then maybe a sound bite of a güiro in a fuller instrumental setting.

We have not discussed specific musical instruments in class. However, we have talked about material culture and the cultural importance of items. This Wikipedia article does not reveal or analyze the value of this item in the Latin American culture. Is this item used by certain groups of people of certain economic or social status? What value is and was the güiro associated with in society? These are only some questions regarding material culture and this item.

Wikipedia

The article I chose to critique was on the cuatro, a guitar-like instrument played throughout South America.

Although the article had very technical information about the instrument’s structure/tuning configuration, there was little to be observed in any other area about its history. The sources listed seem unaffiliated with any specific company. While there is no talk about the article or its information, it doesn’t seem like it needs any – the sources listed are objective databases and whole websites dedicated to a technical description of how the instrument works.

My biggest critique is that it only touches on any sort of background the instrument has in history, mentioning it most likely has roots in another instrument native to Portugal. I would love to see an expansion on how it took off in the recently colonized areas of the New World, how widespread its use is today, or even famous players of it/occurrences in culture outside of South America. Overall, nothing to complain about save for the fact that there is very little of which to have an opinion.